🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.